|
Be Careful What You Measure
By
Peter L DeHaan
April 9, 2008
It's been said that "What gets
measured, gets done – and what gets paid for gets done more." So it is in the
call center. Since call centers produce reams of statistical measurements on
everything an agent does, it seems that much should be accomplished.
Furthermore, when we tie performance pay and productivity incentives to these
stats, then the expectation becomes that we will experience an even greater
productivity boost.
Often, this is exactly what
transpires. As agents witness management consistently measuring and reporting
metrics – such as average time to answer, average handle time, and calls per
hour – they become aware that these measurements are important, realize why they
are significant, and respond with attentive improvements. Some agents are
further motivated to more diligent effort when they see a corresponding bump in
their paycheck.
However, this can be taken to
extreme excesses as agents unreasonably push themselves for unparalleled
statistical accomplishment. For this reason, many call centers with
pay-for-performance incentives, balance productivity (stats) with quality
measurements. Others emphasize quality performance.
The dark side of tracking,
reporting, and paying for statistical success can be seen when agents perceive
the numbers as their sole, end goal; they lose sight of the meaning and reasons
behind the data. At this point, their job ceases to be about providing quality
customer service and is reduced to hitting numerical targets in order to win the
praise and attention of superiors or grow the size of their paychecks.
I have witnessed all
manifestations of this type of excess. Agents can become very creative in
discovering ways to work the system to their advantage. This might be changing
their workflow to achieve improved metrics at the expense of overall
efficiency. Alternatively, they may find workaround strategies, discover
techniques to manipulate the tracking, or merely cheat by taking shortcuts.
I was recently reminded of this
on an industry list serve, when one member stumbled upon and shared a news
report of CSRs being fired for hanging up on callers in order to improve their
stats. The agents had lost all
comprehension that they were there to service callers and became fixated on
achieving better statistical performance. In order to improve their calls
answered per hour and decrease their average handle time, they were routinely
hanging up on half of the calls they answered. One terminated agent claimed
that this was a common practice among the staff at the call center.
Many others on the list serve
chimed in with their own stories. Like the CSRs in the news, some misguided
agents were merely answering calls and then hanging up. Others would answer and
then press the mute button on their headset, waiting for the caller to
disconnect. One manager reported discovering an agent who would rapidly toggle
her mute button while talking in order to produce unintelligible audio thereby
causing the caller to hang-up.
Sadly, I have my own tale. For
weeks, we chased a "technical switch problem" that was disconnecting callers,
only to narrow it down to a particular agent who was hanging up on every third
caller to improve her stats and earn a performance raise. The only thing she
attained was a swift escort to the door.
Perhaps the saying should be
updated to "What gets measured, gets abused – and what gets paid for gets abused
more!"
Peter DeHaan is
Publisher of Connections Magazine,
addressing the teleservices and outsourcing call center industry. At the
website you may read call center articles and whitepapers,
subscribe to the magazine, and read or download past issues. Also, check
out Peter's blog
and
outsourcing
call center newsfeed.
Return
to ATA Page || Read more
articles by Peter DeHaan
|