|
Anything for a Sale
By
Peter L DeHaan
December 20, 2006
Last
year, my family's two favorite TV shows were on the WB and UPN television
networks. These two networks merged this fall to become the CW Television
Network. Since our provider offered both networks, I was confident that would
be no problem receiving the new network. I was wrong.
Repeated
contacts to our provider via email resulted in no response whatsoever. My wife
was aghast; I was not. My expectations were nil and they were squarely met, but
that is a different story for a different time. Subsequent calls to our
provider resulted in no satisfying results or tangible communication.
In the
midst of this, a direct mail piece arrived from a competing provider. It
offered a seemingly attractive price, free installation, and new equipment,
including a DVR (Digital Video Recorder). This was an attractive enticement
since our receiver and remote (free promotional incentives from our existing
provider) were wearing out; the DVR would be a great bonus.
Upon
calling the prospective provider, I talked to a helpful and confident agent,
Karl. My first query was if they carried the CW network. Karl knew all about
the merger (whereas most prior contacts did not) and assured us that they did in
fact carry the new network. Additional probing revealed that my hope of
slashing our bill was not to be realized, but still it was a worthy change as we
would get the new network and new equipment, including a DVR.
My first
clue that Karl's veracity was questionable should have occurred when he insisted
that no additional wiring would be needed to connect the second TV to the single
receiver. I knew that this was technologically feasible via an RF signal as
Karl explained, but I was dubious that such technology would be included in our
free equipment. At this point, however, we had established a rapport and I
trusted him to be both honest and ethical.
I
confirmed my understanding of what Karl said and placed my order. A few days,
the installer arrived and set up the system. He quickly gave an overview of its
operation while the programming was downloading. I asked what number the CW
network was. "That's the new one, right?" he said. "I don't know offhand, but
it's there someplace. If you can't find, it call this number" and he handed me
an information sheet.
Thirty
minutes later and frustrated, I dialed that number. "I'm sorry," the agent
said. "I can only help you with installation issues and this isn't an
installation question. You'll need to call the provider." (We had apparently
bought from an authorized agent.) The provider's call center told me it would
be an extra $5 a month to get the CW network. Mad at this unexpected news, I
called my buddy Karl. Unfortunately, he was no longer my buddy. "I only deal
with sales questions," he stated curtly. "I can't help you," and he hung up.
My wife,
who is tenacious in righting wrongs and fixing the unresolvable, took over our
quest for the CW network. Over the next few days she called Karl, the service
department, the installation line, and the billing department, as well as all
the other numbers she was given. Several days and countless hours later, she
resigned herself to accept that we had been had. During the course of our
dealings, we have been told:
-
The
CW Network is included in your service package.
-
The
CW Network is available for only a dollar more a month.
-
The
CW Network is available for five dollars a month.
-
The
CW Network is not part of your local channels (even though it is a local
channel, albeit an HDTV subcarrier).
-
The
CW Network is available everywhere, but in your area.
At this
time, we still do not have the CW Network, but Karl, who apparently will say
anything to close the deal, did chalk up a sale.
There is
much to be learned from this saga. One seemingly small miscommunication had
widespread and far-reaching ramifications. One agent's words, either out of
intentionality or ignorance, resulted in more that a dozen follow-up phone calls
to multiple call centers, not to mention a new customer who is angry and feels
maligned. It will take great effort to overcome such a bad start. As such,
several recommendations are in order:
-
Training:
If the miscommunication was out of ignorance, then better training could
have averted the whole ordeal. Unfortunately, the payback from training is
not directly quantifiable, whereas sales numbers are. This is a dichotomous
situation that call center managers must acknowledge and grapple with.
-
Call Monitoring:
If the miscommunication was intentional, then some policing is in order.
Making active call monitoring a management mandated priority (and not just
lip service) might have caught the error, could have eliminated the rouge
agent, and certainly would have minimized all agents' propensity towards
untrue statements.
-
Incentives and Measurements:
What gets measured gets done and what gets paid for gets done more.
Again, if the miscommunication was intentional, then it was likely a
calculated lie aimed at making a sale. Unfortunately, call centers'
measurement and reward systems often unwittingly serve for promote and
foster activity and performance that is detrimental to an organization's
overall best interests. The big picture must be continually considered.
-
Third Parties
Accountability:
Whenever customer contact is relegated to a third party, be it an outsourcer
or an authorized representative, control over transactions need to be
retained and carefully tracked by the issuing party. Their organization is
at risk and they need to be able to verify that they are being properly and
ideally represented at all times. This involves more that just tracking
monthly sales totals or costs per call.
-
Consistency:
All agents need to have the same information, supported by the same
technology, and reinforced by the same training so that they will tell
callers the same thing. Furthermore, this needs to be synchronized with
their websites and coordinated with marketing pieces: one message, many
agents, multiple channels.
-
Quickly Salvage Mistakes:
There is a ripple effect when a mistake is made. This occurs both within
the organization has more and more people are pulled into the problem, as
well as outside the organization as more and more people are told about the
problem. Both take their toll. First-call resolution should always be a
goal, but especially when the company is at fault. Front-line reps need to
be empowered to act and to solve pressing issues, not encouraged to end the
call just so they can take the next one in queue.
-
Problem Resolution:
After many calls, finally an agent apologized. But no one ever said, "What
would you like done to resolve this?" No one ever suggested a course of
action and recommended a solution.
[See Anything
for a Sale, part 2 for more on this topic.]
Peter DeHaan is
Publisher of Connections Magazine,
addressing the teleservices and outsourcing call center industry. At the
website you may read call center articles and whitepapers,
subscribe to the magazine, and read or download past issues. Also, check
out Peter's blog
and
outsourcing
call center newsfeed.
Return
to ATA Page || Read more
articles by Peter DeHaan
|